Emails Reveal How Influential Articles That Established COVID-19 Natural Origins Theory Were Formed

Fraud, Scams & Kickbacks 0 Comments

Posted By: Fielden Nolan (nolanf) on 06/09/2021

- June 8, 2021

The two most significant articles promoting the “natural origins” theory for the COVID-19 outbreak originated from scientists who were part of a response team of “experts” brought in by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine (NASEM), in response to a request from a White House official.

These influential articles were used extensively by media organizations to push the natural origins theory, while simultaneously deriding alternative theories—including that of a possible lab leak—as conspiracy theories.

The articles appear to have been part of a coordinated effort originating from a Feb. 1, 2020, teleconference organized by Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Dr. Jeremy Farrar, director of the British Wellcome Trust, which took place after a group of health officials scrambled in late January 2020 to respond to public reporting of a potential connection between COVID-19 and the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

Following the officials’ conversations, public discussion of the source possibly being a lab leak was actively suppressed by social media platforms, health officials, and the World Health Organization (WHO).

The first article, designed more as an open letter to the public, was published on Feb. 19, 2020, and signed by a number of scientists. An early-morning email on Feb. 6, 2020, (p. 251) obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by U.S. Right to Know, revealed that EcoHealth President Peter Daszak drafted the letter calling for “solidarity with all scientists and health professionals in China.”

Daszak’s organization in the past had received $3.7 million in funding from Fauci’s NIAID, at least $600,000 of which was sent to the Wuhan Institute.

Epoch Times Photo

The P4 laboratory on the campus of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, on May 13, 2020. (HECTOR RETAMAL/AFP via Getty Images)

Daszak’s letter notes that “transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins.”

“We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” states the letter signed by 27 scientists.

The second article, “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” published on Mar. 17, 2020, in the journal Nature, targeted the scientific community. This article was led by “corresponding author”  Kristian Andersen, who recently deleted his entire Twitter profile, along with four other researchers.

Notably, of the five scientists credited with writing the article, four had directly participated in the Fauci–Farrar teleconference—which was described in an Feb. 1, 2020, email from Farrar (p. 3,197) as a “discussion … shared in total confidence.”

The one author not present on the Feb. 1, 2020 Teleconference has since recanted his position.

NASEM: Additional Data ‘Needed to Determine the Origin and Evolution of the Virus’

Immediately prior to Daszak circulating the draft of the Lancet letter, there was a meeting (p. 116) on Feb. 3, 2020, organized by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine (NASEM), that reportedly included “officials from the FBI, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, along with the NIH and the Department of Health and Human Services.”

The hastily assembled meeting came at the same-day request of White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) Director Kelvin Droegemeier, who asked the NASEM to “help determine the origins of 2019-nCoV.”

The NASEM meeting came two days after the Fauci–Farrar teleconference. Internal emails of Fauci released through open records requests reveal the teleconference was prompted by the publication of an article in Science that referenced a Nov. 9, 2015, article in Nature about gain-of-function experiments that were being conducted at the Wuhan lab using “chimeric viruses” in mice and funded by Fauci’s organization.

The NASEM meeting included a 10-minute presentation (p. 116) from Fauci during the one-hour gathering, and also included both Daszak and Andersen.

Dr. Anthony Fauci,

NIAID director Dr. Anthony Fauci listens during a Senate Appropriations Labor, Health and Human Services Subcommittee hearing looking into the budget estimates for National Institute of Health and state of medical research on Capitol Hill in Washington, on May 26, 2021. (Sarah Silbiger/Pool/Getty Images)

The internal emails suggest that there was significant internal debate following the formal meeting—from both officials at NASEM and the experts called in by the organization for advice—on the official response to Droegemeier’s request.

Andersen responded to the discussion by Daszak and the rest of the expert group by email (p. 125) on Feb. 4, 2020, writing: “I do wonder if we need to be more firm on the question of engineering. The main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered with intent and that is demonstrably not the case. Engineering can mean many things and could be done for either basic research or nefarious reasons, but the data conclusively show that neither was done.”

However, just days prior, immediately preceding the Feb. 1, 2020, Fauci–Farrar teleconference, Andersen had sent Fauci an email that noted that “one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.”

The NASEM response was also shaped by Trevor Bedford, a computational biologist who suggested: “1. I wouldn’t mention binding sites here. If you start weighing the evidence there’s a lot to consider for both scenarios. 2. I would say ‘no evidence of genetic engineering’ full stop.”

Events were moving rapidly. On Feb. 4, 2020, Andrew Pope of NASEM wrote to the participants, noting: “Plans have changed in terms of our product. Instead of a ‘Based on Science’ web posting, we are now developing a letter that will be signed by the 3 Presidents of our 3 Academies.”

After much deliberation, a Feb. 6, 2020, response from NASEM’s Marcia McNutt, John Anderson, and Victor Dzau was sent to the White House’s Droegemeier, which noted that the NASEM had “consulted leading experts … that could help elucidate the origin and evolution of 2019-nCoV.”

Contained within the letter was the official opinion from the NASEM’s panel of experts, who “informed us that additional genomic sequence data from geographically- and temporally-diverse viral samples are needed to determine the origin and evolution of the virus.”

Drafts of Daszak and Andersen Letters are Circulated

One day prior to the official NASEM response, however, Daszak was already circulating his letter dismissing laboratory origins as a conspiracy theory. And according to Andersen’s co-author Robert Garry, a draft of Andersen’s March 17, 2020, “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” article for Nature was also circulating by the time of NASEM’s response.

Ralph Baric, a virologist who collaborated with Wuhan Institute of Virology director Shi Zheng-Li on gain-of-function experiments, was included in early drafts of Daszak’s letter. In a Feb. 6, 2020, email Daszak wrote that there was “no need for you to sign the ‘Statement’ Ralph!!” to which Baric responded: “I also think this is a good decision. Otherwise it looks self-serving and we lose impact. Ralph”

Notably, Baric was the corresponding author of the Nov. 9, 2015, Nature article that sparked the initial scramble leading to the Feb. 1, 2020, conference call initiated by Fauci and Farrar.

During the circulation of his drafts, Daszak told people (p. 273): “I’ve come up with an initial list below. Please suggest names of your colleagues that you think might also be willing to support this.”

Daszak closed (p. 274) by telling those privy to the early draft, “Please note that this statement will not have EcoHealth Alliance logo on it and will not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person, the idea is to have this as a community supporting our colleagues.”

Interestingly, a day earlier, when Dazsak first began the process of circulating his draft, he stated that he “should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn’t work in a counterproductive way.” Daszak continued, “We’ll then put it out in a way that doesn’t link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice.”

It is not clear why Daszak changed his mind, ultimately becoming a signatory to the letter.

The Feb. 19 Lancet article was signed by 27 scientists from around the world. Although only two signatories, Farrar and Christian Drosten, were actually present on the Feb. 1 teleconference, at least five were directly affiliated with EcoHealth Alliance. Additionally, two were partners of EcoHealth. These affiliations weren’t declared in the Lancet letter. Instead, the authors specifically declared that they had no competing interests.

Additionally, five of the signatories worked with or for the Wellcome Trust headed by Jeremy Farrar.

Some signatories unaffiliated with either the Feb. 1 teleconference or EcoHealth have recently changed their minds on the origins of the virus. Stanley Perlman now says that the lab leak theory is “back on the table.” And signatory Charles Calisher claims that it was “over the top” to call the lab leak a conspiracy theory.

Another signatory, Peter Palese, is now demanding a proper investigation. Most notably, University of Chicago professor Bernard Roizman has stated that the virus originated from the lab due to “sloppiness,“ claiming that Wuhan lab personnel “can’t admit they did something so stupid.”

   Preliminary data were collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients, and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician, per month. These data were presented at the 2009 AMIA c...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  09/15/2021 
   Source: have known for a while that SARS-CoV-2's distinctive "spike" proteins help the virus infect its host by latching on to healthy cells. Now, a major new study shows that they also play a key role in the disease itself.The ...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  09/14/2021 
   - September 9, 2021 of the Effects of COVID-19 Mask Mandates on Hospital Resource Consumption and Mortality at the County LevelSteven G. Schauer, DO, MS, Jason F. Naylor, PA-C, Michael D. April, MD, PhD, Brandon M. Carius, PA-C, and Ian L. Hudson, DO, MPHAuthor information Article notes Copyright and License...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  09/09/2021 
   Conclusion Live vaccine virus shedding is a possible source of transmission of vaccine-strain viral infection but how frequently that occurs is unknown.There is no active surveillance of live virus vaccine shedding and most vaccine strain virus infections likely remain unidentified, untested and unreported.The risks associated with exposure to someone vaccinated with one of the live attenuated vac...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  07/30/2021 
   - July 21, 2021From: of the most intriguing symptoms of COVID-19, has been patients reporting a loss of their sense of smell. Some experts estimate that the loss of the ability to smell (anosmia) affects as many as 70% to 80% of people who catch COVID-19 and seems particularly common among those with mild disease.&nbs...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  07/21/2021 
   - July 19, 2021FROM: new study carried out in Barcelona and published in the National Library of Medicine has confirmed that Vitamin D supplements are associated with better Covid outcomesAbstractPurpose: To analyze the associations between cholecalciferol or calcifediol supplementation, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels and COVID-19 outc...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  07/19/2021 
   From: Katz 1, Sijia Yue 2, Wei Xue 2Affiliations expandPMID: 33418230 PMCID: PMC7716744 DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.111106Free PMC articleAbstractObjective: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has disproportionally affected a variety of patients with underlying risk factors suc...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  07/12/2021 

Legal Resources

Children's Health Defense
Category: Legal
The Children’s Health Defense Legal Section has extensive legal resources that make aware and acquaints individuals about their legally protected rights to encourage, engage and empower individuals in a fight to preserve their fundamental human rights and on issues critical to health freedom. Updated June 21, 2021NoticesNotice for EUA MasksNotice for EUA TestingNotice for EUA VaccinesAd...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  07/11/2021 
   From: engineered spike proteins from SARS-CoV-2 can be STOPPED by a common “weed” that is exterminated from lawns every year. A German university study found that the common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) can block spike proteins from binding to the ACE2 cell ...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  07/03/2021 
   - July 3, 2021 today’s Situation Update, we discuss the astonishing truth that covid cures literally grow like weeds (such as dandelion weeds), yet most people rush to Home Depot to buy toxic, cancer-causing herbicides so they can poison their own lawns, killing off the dandelions and thereby killing...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  07/03/2021 

VIEW News Item

‘Urgent’ British report calls for complete cessation of COVID vaccines in humans

“The MHRA now has more than enough declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe...”
VIEW News Item

Dr. Mercola: Public Health Officials Are Lying About Lockdowns (video)

CDC Inflated COVID-19 Deaths by 1,670%, Violated Fed Law
VIEW News Item


VIEW News Item

Not Just Masks: Biden CDC Surrender Also Includes Changes to Coronavirus Testing for Vaccinated People

“If vaccines work…then why do people who have the vaccine need to now wear masks?”
VIEW News Item

CDC issues new COVID cleaning guidelines

Updated to “reflect the science on transmission.”
VIEW News Item

Legal Help For Religious Exceptions From Vaccinations

Denied? You will first need to file an EEOC Complaint
VIEW News Item

NY: COVID checkpoints are back: Cops will be out 'in force'

Questions Thanksgiving travelers from out of state

VIEW Blog Item

They're Changing the Meaning of Science

Psycho desk jockies and pencil pushers are attempting to redefine science.

We appreciate your donations to NOMASKERS.ORG, because without them this site would not be possible. You do not need a PayPal account in order to donate with your credit card. Just click on the Donate button below. You will be prompted for the amount you wish to contribute.

/* */