Case for Mask Mandate Rests on Bad Data

Mask Science 0 Comments

Posted By: Fielden Nolan (nolanf) on 11/18/2020
A top scientific journal lowballs the percentage of Americans who are already covering their faces.

- November 11, 2020

The top scientific journal Nature Medicine published a study on Oct. 23 with an astounding claim: By simply wearing masks at higher rates, Americans could prevent as many as 130,000 Covid-19 fatalities by the end of February 2021. Produced by the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics Evaluation, or IHME, the study garnered immediate acclaim.

More than 100 news outlets trumpeted the study’s findings in the days following its publication—“The Price for Not Wearing Masks: Perhaps 130,000 Lives” was the New York Times’s headline—and a few hundred more articles have been written since. Reporting was often paired with calls for a national mask mandate, echoing President-elect Biden and now Anthony Fauci, the top U.S. infectious-disease official. The study was also invoked by Francis Collins, head of the National Institutes of Health, to push for stricter masking requirements. Recognizing the potential importance, Nature Medicine rushed the study into print after an expedited peer-review process that took only seven days to complete.

Unfortunately, the IHME modelers’ findings contained an error that even minimal scrutiny should have caught. The projected number of lives saved, and the implied case for a mask mandate, are based on a faulty statistic. Using a months-old survey, IHME modelers assumed erroneously that the U.S. mask-adoption rate stood at only 49% as of late September, and therefore had plenty of room to increase to “universal adoption,” defined as 95%, or to a more plausible 85%. According to more recent survey findings, however, America’s mask-adoption rate has hovered around 80% since the summer.

New numbers would completely alter the IHME study’s findings. If 80% of Americans already wear masks, a new mandate could add only a few percentage points to the mask-adoption rate instead of nearly doubling it. Additional gains would be small and certainly nowhere near 130,000 lives saved.

The study’s documentation suggests the 49% figure came from survey data collected by the data-analytics firm Premise between April 23 and June 26. Although the paper in Nature Medicine explicitly labeled these data as current as of Sept. 21, they weren’t. And other surveys paint a very different picture. The YouGov/Economist tracking poll finds that the U.S. mask-usage rate skyrocketed in late spring and hit 78% on July 14. It has hovered in the high 70s and low 80s ever since.

This marked a dramatic change since March and April, when a flurry of conflicting messages—including from Dr. Fauci, Surgeon General Jerome Adams and the World Health Organization—cast doubt on the effectiveness of masks. As public-health advice shifted in favor of masks, most Americans took notice and added them to their routines.

The IHME team didn’t adjust. Its Sept. 21 estimates of U.S. mask adoption tracked the YouGov survey results beginning in March, but the two began to diverge in April. From mid-June on, the IHME’s Sept. 21 model understated mask usage by about 30 percentage points.

The YouGov survey isn’t alone, and the IHME’s substantially lower estimates make it a clear data outlier. A separate survey by Carnegie Mellon University shows that mask usage exceeded 80% in 41 of the 50 U.S. states as of Sept. 21. Today that’s up to 44 states. In California and the hard-hit Northeast, mask adoption exceeded 90%. These results align with a report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, released a few days after the IHME paper, which shows U.S. mask adoption hitting 88.7% in June.

Part of the problem is that the IHME’s 49% mask-use estimate includes only those survey respondents who say they always wear a mask in public. This narrow definition excludes a great many people who regularly wear masks. YouGov, which gives respondents the option of saying they almost always wear masks, finds a mask-usage rate of 80% in its latest survey of Americans, with only 6% shunning the practice altogether.

The 49% figure hasn’t been accurate since late spring. U.S. masking rates have already approached or exceeded the more plausible threshold sought by IHME modelers. The projection that up to 130,000 lives could be saved appears to be unfounded, weakening the case for a national mask mandate.

The IHME study’s rapid dissemination in the media painted a misleading picture in which masks provide an easy fix to the pandemic. The danger of this misinformation has increased with the incoming Biden administration now signaling that it intends to enact a national mask mandate as one of its first policy directives. The faulty statistic is becoming an established “truth” of science reporting.

Nature Medicine’s editors have shown little interest in addressing the error. I asked the journal’s editors for a response, but they demurred for 13 days—nearly twice the time it took to vet the entire paper—and the belated answer wasn’t to correct course. An editor replied that the “alleged discrepancies” were “not issues of substance that would require further action” because “information about what datasets were utilized in the authors’ models and periods they encompass are reported in the study.”

In layman’s terms, Nature Medicine thinks it’s OK for the IHME team to rely on obsolete figures as long as it cited its source. The misleading depiction of U.S. mask use is apparently immaterial.

The journal has told the Retraction Watch website that its model now assumes 68% U.S. mask usage—still likely too low—along with a substantially smaller projection of lives saved than the one it published. At this point, the refusal to correct the original article serves only to sustain an inflated case for a national mask mandate. Although existing policies and voluntary behavior have already led to major improvement, the IHME paper gives the false impression that Americans continue to lag behind the rest of the world in mask use. As a result, policy makers up to and including the incoming U.S. president are likely basing their case for sweeping new regulations on unsound scientific advice and overstated promises.

Mr. Magness is a senior research fellow at the American Institute for Economic Research.

   Posted 1-27-2021From:, United States2Memphis VA Medical Center (VHA), United States3University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), United States4Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Seton Hall University, United States5University of Texas Health Science Center, United States6Center for Balanced Health, United ...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  01/17/2021 
   From: 1. Parameter Values that vary among the five COVID-19 Pandemic Planning Scenarios. The scenarios are intended to advance public health preparedness and planning.  They are not predictions or estimates of the expected impact of COVID-19.  The parameter values in each scenario will be updat...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  12/26/2020 the link aboveMILTON J. ROSENAU, M.D.AbstractThe experiments here described were performed on an island in Boston Harbor, on volunteers obtained from the Navy. The work was conducted by a group of officers detailed for that purpose, from the U. S. Navy and the U. S. Public Health Service, consisting of Dr. G. W. McCoy, director of ...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  12/17/2020 

Ivermectin is effective for COVID-19: meta analysis of 24 studies

Early treatment is most successful, with an estimated reduction of 87%
Category: Treatment
- December 12, 2020See also Pierre Kory, M.D., Associate Professor of Medicine at St. Luke's Aurora Medical Center, delivers passionate testimony during the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on "Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution, Part II.Ivermectin is effective for COVID-19. 100% of studies report positive effe...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  12/13/2020 

Mask Science

Why they don't work and much more. PDF format.
Category: Downloadables
From: Masks do not prevent virus respiratory illness. Size matters! Viruses are 50x smaller than bacteria and 1000x smaller than a hair ...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  12/11/2020 

Face Mask Exempt Care

Freedom to Breathe: Wearing a mask or any other "face covering" is NOT a law
Category: Downloadables
Wearing a mask or any other "face covering" is NOT a law. Protect your freedom and personal liberty by knowing your rights. Use the below resources to understand any unlawful conduct. Memorize it and print the .pdf version to have it with you to be presented as necessary.  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  12/09/2020 
   CBER Plans for Monitoring COVID-19 Vaccine Safety and EffectivenessDocument is in the .PDF format...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  12/09/2020 
   - December 7, 2020See attached .pdf document link.Evidence on the protective effect of mask use in community settings  At present there is only limited and inconsistent scientific evidence to support the effectiveness of masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2 (75). A large randomized community-based tr...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  12/07/2020 
   - November 27, 2020From: Also: Background: Up-to-date, there is no recognized effective treatment or vaccine for the treatment of COVID-19 that emphasize urgency around distinctive effective therapies. This study aims to evaluate the anti...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  11/27/2020 
   - November 19, 2020A team of Irish medical and public health professionals recently published a White Paper entitled “COVID-19 Alternative Strategy: A Case for Health and Socioeconomic Wellbeing,” calling for an “evidence-based” approach to pandemic management. In the paper, the team provides a cost-benefit analysis of lockdowns and scrutinizes their overall efficacy while ...  READ MORE
- Fielden Nolan (nolanf),  11/19/2020 

VIEW News Item


VIEW News Item

NY: COVID checkpoints are back: Cops will be out 'in force'

Questions Thanksgiving travelers from out of state
VIEW News Item

FL: Anthony Sabatini files 8 lawsuits over mandatory mask mandates

"It’s overkill, and it’s not the role of government."
VIEW News Item

UK: Thousands of COVID-19 deaths 'will be wiped off the official toll'

Counted victims if they died from any cause months later after beating disease
VIEW News Item

GALLUP: Mental health rating of Americans slumps to new low

"Worse than it has been at any point in the last two decades"
VIEW News Item

Model Bella Hadid gives the NYPD the middle finger

Calls out police officers for not wearing masks
VIEW News Item

Four trial volunteers who got Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine developed Bell's palsy

FDA denies that the temporary facial paralysis was caused by the shot
VIEW News Item

Minority Students Crushed By Lockdowns

600% Increase In Math Failures, 500% English
VIEW News Item

In case you thought the PCR test detects an actual virus…wrong

A few more moments of clear thought, and you realize the whole string of “science”...isn't science at all.

VIEW Blog Item

A Message to Maskers

Do you believe nomaskers are a threat? If so, read on...

We appreciate your donations to NOMASKERS.ORG, because without them this site would not be possible. You do not need a PayPal account in order to donate with your credit card. Just click on the Donate button below. You will be prompted for the amount you wish to contribute.